COVID-19, FLOOD, WIND, FIRE, & FEMA FUNDING AVAILABLE

FEMA Appeals: Increasing Your Odds of Success

Woman filing fema appeals paperwork to overturn a denial decision.

FEMA appeals play a vital role in helping municipal entities, schools, nonprofits, and others recover from times of disaster. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) is crucial in providing financial assistance to help communities, schools, and nonprofits recover. However, there are many instances when these entities are denied assistance by FEMA, despite their genuine need, leaving them struggling to recover. This article will cover common reasons for denials and how to effectively navigate the FEMA appeals process, which has tight deadlines and burdensome requirements.

Entities denied FEMA Public Assistance (PA) for disaster recovery projects can appeal the decision. FEMA appeals can be filed for various reasons, including eligibility determination, project eligibility, cost eligibility, insurance coverage, and environmental and historic preservation compliance.

It’s important to note that there are strict deadlines for filing appeals with FEMA, typically within 60 days of receiving the denial letter, so seek FEMA appeals help as soon as possible if your entity needs it. Additionally, appeals must be submitted in writing and include all relevant documentation to support the appeal.

Reasons for Denial

One common reason for denial is the lack of sufficient documentation to support the claim, which can require FEMA appeals help. FEMA requires detailed documentation, including damage assessments, cost estimates, and other supporting documents, to prove the extent of the damage and the need for assistance. Without this documentation, FEMA may deny the request for assistance, leaving the entity without the funds needed to recover.

FEMA may also determine that certain costs associated with the project are not eligible for reimbursement under the PA program. This could include expenses not considered reasonable, necessary, or directly related to the disaster, although these measures are highly subjective and inconsistently applied. Additionally, FEMA may deny assistance if the applicant fails to maintain adequate insurance coverage as the law requires. However, if the applicant can demonstrate that the insurance coverage was not adequate or that there were extenuating circumstances, they may be able to appeal the denial.

Furthermore, FEMA may deny assistance if the project violates environmental and historic preservation laws and regulations. However, if the applicant can demonstrate that they have taken all necessary steps to comply or that there are no feasible alternatives, they may be able to appeal the denial.

Another reason for denial is ineligibility. This could include situations where FEMA determines that the applicant is not a governmental entity or a private nonprofit organization eligible for assistance. FEMA may also decide that the specific project for which the applicant seeks assistance is not eligible for PA funding.

Entities that do not meet FEMA’s eligibility criteria, such as those without the required insurance coverage or that fail to meet other program requirements, may be denied assistance. Additionally, FEMA may deny assistance if there is a disagreement on the costs that are eligible for reimbursement, often due to a misunderstanding of FEMA’s guidelines. Failure to apply within FEMA’s specified timeframe can also result in denial of assistance, which can be challenging for entities dealing with the aftermath of a disaster.

Problems with FEMA's Determinations

One of the challenges faced by entities seeking FEMA assistance and requiring FEMA appeals is the need for more consistency in FEMA’s determinations, attributed to factors such as the quality of staff, high turnover rates, and confusion over the rules and guidelines. The quality of staff assigned to evaluate and process assistance applications can vary widely, leading to consistency in how applications are evaluated and decisions are made. High turnover rates among FEMA staff can also contribute to consistency, as the loss of institutional knowledge and experience can make it difficult to maintain consistent evaluation standards over time.

Additionally, clarity over the rules and guidelines governing FEMA assistance can further exacerbate inconsistencies, as the complex nature of these rules can lead to differing interpretations among FEMA staff, resulting inconsistent determinations.

In addition to the challenges mentioned, another issue that can lead to unjustified denials is the need for more clarity and consistency in FEMA’s communication with applicants. The language used in FEMA’s communications, such as denial letters, can be complex and challenging to understand, especially for entities already dealing with a disaster’s aftermath. This lack of clarity can make it difficult for applicants to fully understand why their request for assistance was denied and what steps they need to take to appeal the decision.

In some cases, FEMA may have yet to thoroughly evaluate the damage and the entity’s eligibility for assistance, leading to an unjustified denial. FEMA’s evaluators may also need to fully understand the unique needs and challenges that municipal entities, schools, and nonprofits face. This leads to denials not based on the entity’s actual circumstances.

Furthermore, FEMA’s communication with applicants can sometimes be inconsistent, with different staff members providing conflicting information or interpretations of FEMA’s guidelines. This inconsistency can further complicate the appeals process, as applicants may receive conflicting advice on proceeding with their appeal.

In these cases, appealing the denial and providing additional information and evidence to support the claim can help overturn the decision. Entities denied assistance by FEMA can appeal the decision, allowing them to present further information and evidence to support their claim.

Two men in hardhats assessing a disaster that needed fema appeals paperwork submitted to overturn a previously denied claim.

How FEMA Appeals Work

The FEMA appeals process typically involves requesting a reconsideration, where the entity can submit additional documentation and evidence to support its claim. Hiring a consulting firm like Berquist Recovery Consulting can be beneficial in this process, as they can provide expert guidance and support to help navigate the appeals process and increase the chances of a successful outcome.

Entities seeking to file a FEMA appeal must follow specific steps to process their appeal correctly. Here’s a general outline of the steps involved:

1. Review the Denial Letter

Carefully review the denial letter from FEMA to understand the reasons for the denial and the deadline for filing an appeal. The letter should also provide information on where to send the appeal.

2. Gather Documentation

Collect all relevant documentation to support your appeal. This may include damage assessments, cost estimates, insurance documentation, and other evidence supporting your claim for FEMA assistance.

3. Write an Appeal Letter

Draft a formal appeal letter to FEMA. The letter should clearly state that you are appealing the denial of assistance and explain why you believe the denial was incorrect. Be sure to include your FEMA registration number, the disaster number, and the date of the denial letter.

4. Submit the Appeal

Submit your appeal letter and all supporting documentation to FEMA. Be sure to follow the instructions in the denial letter for where to send the appeal. Keep a copy of your appeal letter and all documentation for your records. Be aware of deadlines on when appeals need to be filed, they are generally 60 days from the denial letter date.

5. Await Response & Follow-Up

After submitting your appeal, FEMA will review your case and issue a written decision. This process can take several weeks or even months, depending on the complexity of your case and the volume of appeals being processed.

Getting Professional FEMA Appeals Help

Appealing a FEMA denial can be a complex and challenging process, but securing the assistance needed for recovery is often necessary. Working with experienced consultants like BRC who understand FEMA’s guidelines and the appeals process can greatly increase the chances of a successful appeal. These consultants can help entities gather the necessary documentation, navigate the appeals process, and present a strong case for why the denial should be overturned based on similar work to help other entities with FEMA appeals.

Additionally, consultants can provide valuable expertise and guidance throughout the process, helping entities understand their rights and options and ensure the best possible success. By leveraging consultants’ expertise like Berquist Recovery Consulting, entities can maximize their chances of receiving the FEMA assistance they need to recover and rebuild.

By understanding the reasons for denial and the appeals process, municipal entities, schools, and nonprofits can better advocate for the assistance they deserve from FEMA. With the help of consulting firms like Berquist Recovery Consulting, entities can ensure that they have the support and resources needed to recover from disasters and rebuild their communities.

Want a professional to take a no-cost look at your appeal case? Schedule a conversation today with one of our consultants.

Handshake between two people.